Forum › The Longship › Why McCarthy-Vikings experiment went south so quic...

Why McCarthy-Vikings experiment went south so quickly

Cricket
Cricket
Mod June 2026 Trivia Champion
Joined May 2013
4,242 posts
Rep: 3,542

LIVE WELL ~ LOVE MUCH ~ LAUGH OFTEN

Liked:
#1 · Sep 30, 8:05 AM
HO
Joined Apr 2024
561 posts
Rep: 645

greediron wrote:

I didn't want Darnold, at least not for that kind of money. He would have been awful behind our 2025 O-line. So yeah, all those now claiming we should have kept him conveniently forgot how bad he looked those last two games.
And as far as Danny Dimes goes, what has he done? They rode Taylor out to a 6-0 start, traded for Sauce and then folded. Danny got hurt somewhere in there, but he was part of the collapse and the 1-2 start.

I'll just say this. If you had Darnold on this team right now a lot of people would be pretty damn excited!

I was ok with letting him go also, but I was wrong!

Liked:
#42 · Sep 30, 6:28 PM CT
greediron
greediron
Mod
Joined May 2013
1,661 posts
Rep: 1,564

hogjowlsjohnny wrote:

I'll just say this. If you had Darnold on this team right now a lot of people would be pretty damn excited!
I was ok with letting him go also, but I was wrong!

But that would have meant you had him last year. And I doubt anyone would have been excited.

Liked:
#43 · Sep 30, 6:46 PM CT
IceRatz16
Joined Dec 2016
391 posts
Rep: 536

Montana Tom wrote:

I said it on draft day two years ago and I'll say it again. We shoulda taken Bo Nix.
He was there, he had many years as a starter in a passing offense (including setting an NCAA record for completion percentage his last season at Oregon). And he already took the Broncos to one playoff.
That's all you need to know, especially now with 20/20 hindsight.

No thanks. Bo Nix is not a good QB. He's fortunate falling to Payton, as if he went anywhere else, he wouldn't be starting anymore. His first season's first 7 games were the worst I've ever seen any QB play. Most of you get up in arms with McCarthy's throwing, yet Bo couldn't hit the broadside of the barn at the time. He's developed into what Sean wanted and is serviceable and a competitor, but I wouldn't want him leading my team.

Liked:
#44 · Sep 30, 7:26 PM CT
HO
Joined Apr 2024
561 posts
Rep: 645

greediron wrote:

But that would have meant you had him last year. And I doubt anyone would have been excited.

No doubt about that. Skule and company would have him back to the old Darnold. Darnold isn't the greatest QB, but he's pretty darn good and is a franchise QB.

Liked:
#45 · Sep 30, 8:30 PM CT
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum › The Longship › Why McCarthy-Vikings experiment went south so quic...
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!

You belong here, Vikings fan.

Join the VikeFans community to share your takes, react to posts, and talk Vikings with fans who get it.